<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>cine + octo = boo - Latest Comments in Why &amp;#8220;The Beatles in mono&amp;#8221; is not a &amp;#8220;Kubrick aspect ratio&amp;#8221; issue</title><link>http://cineoctoboo.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://cineoctoboo.disqus.com/why_8220the_beatles_in_mono8221_is_not_a_8220kubrick_aspect_ratio8221_issue/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 15:23:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why &amp;#8220;The Beatles in mono&amp;#8221; is not a &amp;#8220;Kubrick aspect ratio&amp;#8221; issue</title><link>http://cineoctoboo.com/2009/09/17/why-the-beatles-in-mono-is-not-a-kubrick-aspect-ratio-issue/#comment-637193403</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice post indeed! It never occurred to me the similarities between these two arguments. Thanks for posting!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fab</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 15:23:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>